Prototype — every organisation, score and review below is illustrative sample data, not a real assessment.
Kasese · Child nutrition
Community-run therapeutic feeding for children under five.
A collective of 22 village nutrition groups that screen children monthly and run therapeutic feeding with locally sourced supplements. Caregivers are trained as screeners, so coverage continues between clinical visits. The collective has strong household-level cost data and weaker formal governance documentation.
How the organisation is rooted in the community it serves, and whether its work holds together as a credible theory of change.
1.Community voice & beneficiary feedback
8.0Caregiver committees hold veto over supplement sourcing; minutes submitted for 11 meetings.
2.Local leadership & staff representation
9.0All coordinators are group members from Kasese; leadership is entirely local.
3.Theory of change coherence
7.0Clear pathway from screening to recovery, though recovery is tracked for only one cohort year.
4.Transparency & financial accountability
5.0Internal accounts only — no external audit submitted. Registration certificate present.
5.Adaptive capacity & learning culture
7.0Switched supplement recipe after a documented acceptance problem in 2023.
What a donor's money reaches, who it reaches, and what funding history the organisation already carries.
6.Cost per impacted woman or child
9.0Strong unit cost workings with itemised supplement and screening costs.
7.Demographic focus & vulnerability specificity
8.0MUAC-based targeting with vulnerability screening documented.
8.Economic factor impacted
8.0Household clinic-visit costs avoided evidenced by a 140-household sample.
9.Number of previous donor relationships
4.0One named institutional funder plus diaspora giving; limited funder history.
10.Types of previous donor support received
3.0Small restricted grants only; no technical or unrestricted support recorded.