Prototype — every organisation, score and review below is illustrative sample data, not a real assessment.

TumainiBridge

For organisations

Evidence templates & checklists

Strong submissions win donor trust. These checklists show the documents and proof points editors look for under each metric. Downloadable templates are draft guides for the Uganda pilot.

Pillar I · Human Impact

How the organisation is rooted in the community it serves, and whether its work holds together as a credible theory of change.

1.Community voice & beneficiary feedback

How do the women and children served shape and critique the programme?

  • Feedback mechanism description, beneficiary survey results, documented programme changes made in response.

2.Local leadership & staff representation

Who leads, and how closely does the team reflect the community served?

  • Leadership and board composition, staff origin breakdown, local hiring policy.

3.Theory of change coherence

Do activities, outputs, and health outcomes connect logically and with evidence?

  • Theory of change document, outcome data over at least two periods, cited external evidence base.

4.Transparency & financial accountability

Can an outsider trace where money went and who checked?

  • Audited accounts, registration certificate, published annual report, named audit firm.

5.Adaptive capacity & learning culture

What has the organisation stopped, changed, or admitted was not working?

  • Learning reviews, documented pivots with rationale, failure or lessons-learned reporting.
Pillar II · Funding Profile

What a donor's money reaches, who it reaches, and what funding history the organisation already carries.

6.Cost per impacted woman or child

What does one meaningful health outcome cost, and how was that figure derived?

  • Programme budget, reach numbers, unit-cost calculation method and assumptions.

7.Demographic focus & vulnerability specificity

How precisely is the served population defined, and how vulnerable is it?

  • Beneficiary demographic breakdown, targeting criteria, vulnerability indicators used.

8.Economic factor impacted

What economic burden on households does the work relieve?

  • Out-of-pocket cost avoided, income or productivity effects, catastrophic-expenditure data.

9.Number of previous donor relationships

How many funders have already reviewed and backed this work?

  • Named current and past funders, grant periods, reference contacts.

10.Types of previous donor support received

What kinds of support has the organisation absorbed and managed?

  • Grant agreements, restricted vs unrestricted split, in-kind and technical support records.

Submit when you are ready

You do not need every document to submit. The template is a guide, not a gate. Start with what you have and update your profile as your evidence grows.

Start a submission