Prototype — every organisation, score and review below is illustrative sample data, not a real assessment.

TumainiBridge
← All organisations

Mbale · Adolescent sexual & reproductive health

Mbale Girls Health Initiative

School-based reproductive health services for adolescent girls.

Adolescent girls

Works through 34 secondary schools with nurse-led clinics, peer educators, and a referral pathway for pregnancy and gender-based violence cases. Girls sit on the programme design committee. Financial systems are still maturing after rapid growth.

Pillar I · Human Impact

Human Impact

How the organisation is rooted in the community it serves, and whether its work holds together as a credible theory of change.

7.2/ 10 · mean of five metrics
  • 1.Community voice & beneficiary feedback

    9.0

    Girls' design committee minutes and 900-respondent survey submitted with change log.

  • 2.Local leadership & staff representation

    8.0

    Founded and led by Mbale-based educators; entire team recruited locally.

  • 3.Theory of change coherence

    7.0

    Coherent pathway; outcome data covers service uptake more than downstream health results.

  • 4.Transparency & financial accountability

    4.0

    First external audit is in progress — only management accounts were available.

  • 5.Adaptive capacity & learning culture

    8.0

    Dropped a standalone campaign after documented low uptake and reallocated resources.

Pillar II · Funding Profile

Funding Profile

What a donor's money reaches, who it reaches, and what funding history the organisation already carries.

6.4/ 10 · mean of five metrics
  • 6.Cost per impacted woman or child

    9.0

    Low unit cost supported by clear per-school budget workings.

  • 7.Demographic focus & vulnerability specificity

    8.0

    Age and school-enrolment targeting is precise; out-of-school girls not yet reached.

  • 8.Economic factor impacted

    6.0

    School-retention argument made but not costed with evidence.

  • 9.Number of previous donor relationships

    5.0

    Two named funders; one is a first-time grant made this year.

  • 10.Types of previous donor support received

    4.0

    Restricted project grants only.

Compare with

Others working in adolescent sexual & reproductive health

Open the comparison tool →