Prototype — every organisation, score and review below is illustrative sample data, not a real assessment.
Mbarara · Malaria prevention & treatment
Household malaria prevention and rapid treatment for young children.
Combines net distribution with village health teams trained to test and treat within 24 hours of fever onset. Household economic data is unusually strong because the organisation ran a two-year expenditure study with a local university.
How the organisation is rooted in the community it serves, and whether its work holds together as a credible theory of change.
1.Community voice & beneficiary feedback
7.0Household surveys inform distribution rounds; feedback loop documented but annual.
2.Local leadership & staff representation
8.0Village health team model is entirely community-staffed; management is Mbarara-based.
3.Theory of change coherence
8.0Test-and-treat timing pathway supported by three years of case data.
4.Transparency & financial accountability
7.0Audited accounts for 2023 submitted; 2024 audit pending.
5.Adaptive capacity & learning culture
6.0Retargeted distribution after a documented coverage gap analysis.
What a donor's money reaches, who it reaches, and what funding history the organisation already carries.
6.Cost per impacted woman or child
9.0Cost per treated case well evidenced from procurement records.
7.Demographic focus & vulnerability specificity
6.0Broad child targeting; vulnerability specificity limited.
8.Economic factor impacted
10.0University-partnered study quantifies catastrophic household expenditure avoided.
9.Number of previous donor relationships
7.0Four named funders with overlapping grant periods.
10.Types of previous donor support received
6.0Restricted grants plus in-kind net supply.